Georgia Voices: The Buffett Gimmick - Focus on spending, not soaking rich
by The Augusta Chronicle
April 24, 2012 12:01 AM | 845 views | 8 8 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
It’s still early, but the Obama campaign so far is built on the “Buffett Rule” — a proposal to soak the rich with higher taxes because, hey, they’re not paying their fair share.

A couple of major problems with that.

First, even some prominent liberals admit a surtax on the rich is nothing more than a gimmick.

“It’s total gimmickry,” said left-leaning Politico.com executive editor Jim Vandehei.

“President Obama admits it: His proposed ‘Buffett Rule’ tax on millionaires is a gimmick,” wrote liberal Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank.

“The Buffett Rule is running into a dead end,” writes conservative Byron York in the Washington Examiner, “because a significant part of the political class in Washington has finally admitted the idea is little more than a gimmick that would do nothing to fix the country’s problems.”

Why is it a gimmick? And why does even the president know it? Because the math is simple: It would raise an estimated $4.7 billion a year — when the federal government’s annual deficits under this president are in excess of $1 trillion.

It is, in short, a sick joke. A joke, because it does next to nothing to solve our debt problems, and sick because the proposal is designed with one thing in mind: to divide America along class lines in order to benefit this president politically.

It may look like it, but proponents of the Buffett Rule didn’t flunk math. They know exactly what they’re doing. It’s an election-year diversion, a sop to voters weary of the Obama economy and willing and eager to buy the fable that the uber-rich and their greed are to blame for all our problems. And, of course, that the rich need to pay their fair share.

As the numbers above prove, it’s a lie that the rich are to blame for Washington’s spending problem. As the numbers below bear out, it’s a lie that they’re not paying their fair share:

* the top 1 percent pay nearly 37 percent of all federal income taxes;

* the top 5 percent pay nearly 59 percent of all federal income taxes;

* the top 10 percent pay over 70 percent of all federal income taxes;

* the top 25 percent pay over 87 percent of all federal income taxes;

* the top 50 percent pay almost 98 percent of all federal income taxes.

* In addition, we are at the point where about 50 percent of American taxpayers pay nothing.

While this president wants you to believe the gimmickry and lies of the Buffett Rule, he also knows it has no chance of passing: It failed in the Democrat-controlled Senate this past week, and is a total nonstarter in the Republican-controlled House. So if he knows that — and surely he does — then the only reason he’s pushing it is for political effect — to whip up the peasantry, as it were, to revolt against its rich oppressors.

That’s called being disingenuous. And this president has taken that art to new heights.

The truth that Mr. Obama doesn’t want to talk about — other than his disastrous record on everything under the sun — is that all taxpaying Americans are going to be slammed with precipitously higher taxes next January: the expiration of $500 billion in tax breaks. Some are calling it “Taxmeggedon.”

If you’re wondering, experts say 70 percent of the new taxes will be on middle- and low-income taxpayers.

That, and Washington’s unchecked, depraved robbery of future generations, is what we should be talking about.

Not a Gimmick and a Lie.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
rjsnh
|
April 24, 2012
Off Balance...you certainly are! I made my point very clear. I said taxes on the rich were at a hundred year low and yes, that is history. So, when the editorial talks about "soaking the rich" it is way off base. We have not been soaking the rich, rather we have been LOWERING their taxes for decades. So, yes we need to raise them some...at least back to Reagan era rates...and, we need to cut spending....something Bush NEVER did when he failed to fund the unnecessary wars he got us in. There is no justification for lowering taxes at the same time you're spending more for wars and prescription drug programs which is just what he did for 8 years...and, look where it got us...into a fine mess.
reagan-rules
|
April 25, 2012
Republican 101- Tax cuts pay for themselves and "Ronald Reagan proved deficits don't matter".
anonymous
|
April 24, 2012
Increased worker productivity has been translated into increased corporate profits, soaring pay for CEO's and depressed wages for the worker. Why isn't that called "soaking" the middle class?
misterbill
|
April 24, 2012
There are , indeed , a couple of major problems with the "Buffett Gimmick".

First it does nothing to solve our problem.

Thus, there is no reason to site any following reasons. Only a dyed in the wool redistribution devotee would support without regard for its "flaws"..
what the
|
April 25, 2012
Of course it does nothing to solve our problem. Only defunding Planned Parenthood and Public Broadcasting will solve our problem!
rjsnh
|
April 24, 2012
good grief....study your American history....taxes on the rich are at their lowest level in nearly a hundred years...and, if you chart big drops in taxes on the rich you'll find recessions soon follow...go figure....if anyone is engaged in "class warfare" it is the rich who are so afraid they'll have to flee to the Hamptons or a resort island to escape being a part of the solution to our financial crisis...one they have so benefited from...
Off Balance
|
April 24, 2012
good grief... study your American history.. at one time there were no taxes. Hmmm, the government was able to support itself on levies, excises and duties.

Yes, I realize the government is much, much larger now, but so is the population. Those in DC, after a short while, forget the value, the worth of the enormous amounts of money they collect in revenue and taxes and become enured to the amounts they deal with.

Billions to illegal immigrants, everyone looking to dip into the welfare or disability coffers, it's no wonder the strain on our budget.

Your solution is not to take a balanced approach, just raise the taxes on the rich.

The article above points out the hypocrisy of the "gimmick" and how it will not do much to resolve our problems. You are either mathematically challenged or so wrapped up in your ideology that all you can do is strike out at those who are monied.

We need a much broader solution.
FROM TEXAS
|
April 24, 2012
Federal tax is the way to go all people should pay into it, I’m tired of hearing that if you work hard make more you should be penalized for that. I say put a 75% tax on sports stars and entertainment business they seem to support all these liberal ideas as long as they don’t pay. Make the Federal governerment put back all my social security money they stole both Democrat and Republican. Leave my damn 401K alone as well get off your butts and fix the economy all we have heard is social engineering sick of it!!
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides