Georgia Voices: Imposing the death penalty?
by The Augusta Chronicle
May 30, 2011 | 914 views | 1 1 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
When you’re a judge in a criminal case, you sometimes make decisions that could come back to haunt you.

But it’s not often a judge makes a ruling, outside of a death penalty case, in which he or she has to know that someone may die as a result.

This may be one of those cases.

With the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision ordering California to release up to 46,000 prisoners to relieve overcrowding, even some of the dissenting justices are warning that “terrible things are sure to happen as a consequence of this outrageous order.” So says Justice Antonin Scalia, with Justice Clarence Thomas in agreement.

Note that he doesn’t say “likely” or even “probably,” but “sure” to happen.

In other words, the high court made a ruling in which they should know people will suffer, perhaps even die, as a result.

Scalia called the majority’s ruling “staggering” and “absurd.” He’s being kind.

You wouldn’t expect the U.S. Supreme Court to write fiction, either, but Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the majority, produced a novel twist on his ruling in urging lower-court judges overseeing the prisoner release to do so “consistent with the public safety.” That’s like telling someone to jump in a pool in a way “consistent with not getting wet.” Neither can be done.

California will get more dangerous as a result of this ruling. People will suffer. There can be little doubt.

Ultimately, the American people and their craven politicians are to blame for not having the basic fortitude to build enough prison space for the amount of prisoners we have. And while it’s a dubious proposition that prison overcrowding is both “cruel and unusual,” as the Eight Amendment proscribes — how can rampant, nationwide overcrowding possibly be said to be “unusual”? — even criminals in a civil society deserve better.

Yet, the public safety must come first. In our view, judges have no place telling states to release criminals who have yet to pay their debt to society. We’ve got enough of them on the street already!

Thankfully, the state hopes to avoid setting any free — by such maneuvers as sending prisoners to county facilities. Let’s hope that works.

The five justices who ordered the release should hope so too.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
anonymous
|
June 01, 2011
Right. We are going to let all of the VIOLENT offenders out first. But then, on second thought, it is government workers than will be making the decisions as to who is released, so...yep it could very well be the VIOLENT offenders that they let out first.

In a sane world, we could release at least that many small time non violent, minor offenders without much of a problem/threat for public safety. The problem will be that now that they are convicts, finding work will be very difficult...and if they do find work, it will be a meager wage at best.

I bet most Georgians would be stunned to learn that this state has 82 separate prisons that house over 60,000 people (all paid for at the rate of about $20,000/prisoner/year by taxpayers).
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides