Bales victim of a senseless war
March 30, 2012 12:00 AM | 489 views | 6 6 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DEAR EDITOR:

As a Cold War and Vietnam-era veteran I have concerns that I’m sure that every person who has served shares. Sgt. Bales is an NCO, which tells me he is no raw recruit, and I understand that this was not his first tour in a combat zone, far from it. I understand the sense of responsibility that an NCO feels for those subordinate to him and I suspect that feeling is more intense under combat conditions.

Just how many sequential tours to a combat zone should a soldier make? Even if they volunteer shouldn’t they be closely monitored and be rotated off for a decent amount of time? Wars are, or should be, fought to be won, not used to make political points. Just like Vietnam, Afghanistan is a political war, nothing more.

Our service men and women have become nothing more than pawns in a political chess match and it needs to stop.

If America is threatened, then certainly we should fight, but sacrificing our youth for political games is pure madness. Better to develop an herbicide that kills opium poppies, spray the wretched place and come home.

Sgt. Bales is most certainly a casualty of a senseless war.

G.V. Harper
Marietta
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
what the
|
March 30, 2012
All wars are basicly political and as Herman Goering said, the people can be easily be manipulated to support them. Today only a tiny fraction of our population represent the military and their familys. For everyone else it's just business as usual. That's the problem, if the American people have no skin in the game these wars will continue because they are politically and financially profitable to many interests. It has been said that an army does not go to war a nation does, we have lost track of that concept.
Viet Vet Eyes
|
March 30, 2012
I agree with your comments G. V. Harper. Starting with Viet Nam and maybe Korea, the U.S. has not engaged in wars to win them all out. They are fought for political reasons, both for the U.S. and other countries, collectively.

Soldiers in WWI and WWII were fighting for a victory and mostly knew there was an end to that war if they were victorious. Since Viet Nam, any soldier who gives any thought to it, will see that their fighting may only give a partial victory or none at all. Soldiers are fighting now for the political career of whatever President is in office, which gives a completely different mind set to that soldier than in the previous two world wars.

There are terrorists and crazies in too many countries for U.S. soldiers to fight in every one of them today. We do not have the manpower nor the funds to do that. Time to reassess our strategies and defend the U.S. in a different way.

Bring our troops home form Afghanistan.
Soldier's wife
|
March 30, 2012
You are so right. This has become Obama's Vietnam. While my husband and others must play under the harshest rules of engagement, the politicians in Washington sit back and apologize for every little perceived slight of people who will never, ever like or accept western ways. We accomplished the main mission years ago and the country is now nothing but a draw for jihadists to come in from all over (including saudis) to get their chance to become martyrs for allah and to get battle experience. They come from all over to shoot at the Americans, yet when they were protesting outside the gates of our bases at Bagram and Kandahar we could have taken them out -- enemy combatants posturing before the world and laughing that the American's hands are tied.

Obama, I cannot stand you, but why not fullfill your campaign promise to your base and bring our people home. Don't wait until just before the election. Do it now. By the way, I am as much of a hawk as you will ever meet, but I don't want my husband and friends sacrificed for Obama's politics.
anonymous
|
March 30, 2012
You know that Obama campaigned on increasing troop levels in Afghanistan, right?
eCobb Dad of 3
|
March 30, 2012
"Afghanistan is a political war, nothing more."

Probably the most ill informed comment I've ever seen in the MDJ. How soon we as American's forget that Afghanistan was a lawless land that terrorists festered and grew stronger. Here we are only 11 years away from the greatest tragedy to befall our nation and people think that we are in a political war. How short sighted is that? Should we just leave and let the country fall into the Taliban and the terrorists again? If so we'll be back there fighting in another 10 years. When will people learn that our two great oceans will no longer protect us from the dangers of the world? Isolationism brought us two world wars and 9/11 we need to learn from our mistakes and not repeat them.

The killing of innocent civilians is a horrific tragedy and I agree the military needs to do a better job of recognizing when a soldier needs to be pulled away from the war zone but to say there is no noble purpose for our being over there is gravely misguided and naive.
Last GA Democrat
|
March 30, 2012
I couldn't agree more with your commentary.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides