Runoff election caps complete turnover of Cobb EMC board
by Kim Isaza
newseditor@mdjonline.com
Apr 22, 2012 | 4719 views | 27 27 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Tripper Sharp speaks with Jim Hudson and David Cohen at the Cobb EMC runoff election at Piedmont Baptist Church on Saturday. <br> Photo by Todd Hull
view slideshow (2 images)
MARIETTA — Cobb EMC members split their votes between slates for seats on the utility’s board of directors, electing Tripper Sharp and David McClellan in the utility’s first-ever runoff elections Saturday. The vote capped a bitter, political-style campaign, but also marked the close of the 2007 member lawsuit that paved the way for an entirely new board.

Sharp, one of the plaintiffs to that lawsuit, was supported in his bid for the Area 5 seat by three of his fellow plaintiffs, but was stridently opposed by the two best-known plaintiffs, Butch Thompson and Bo Pounds. He earned 835 votes (52 percent) over Charles Sevier, who received 761 votes (48 percent). On March 31, when there were nine candidates vying for the seat, Sharp led Sevier by 273 votes. This time, his victory was just 74 votes.

Sharp said he was disappointed in the negative tone of the campaign, but is ready to take his seat on the board.

“We have to put the EMC members first and move this organization forward,” Sharp said. “They are more important than any one board member.”

McClellan, who will represent Area 4, won 820 votes (52 percent) over Jim Hudson, who received 771 votes (48 percent). Both he and Sevier were endorsed by the Cobb EMC Owners Association and Thompson and Pounds.

It was a come-from-behind win for McClellan, who had finished 80 votes behind Hudson in the eight-person field on March 31. On Saturday, he prevailed by 49 votes.

McClellan said he hadn’t known what to expect.

“I’m glad it’s over and done with,” he said. “Now we move forward.”

But that did not happen immediately. As he offered to shake hands with his opponent in the sanctuary of Piedmont Church, where the vote was held, Hudson refused.

“I don’t want to shake your hand,” Hudson said to McClellan. “I don’t like the way you ran your campaign, and I think it’s trash.”

McClellan responded that he was sorry Hudson felt that way, and said later that he believed he ran a fair campaign, even with ads that some considered negative.

Hudson, though, said he is happy that Sharp was elected.

“We’ve got a great person in Tripper,” he said. “What we and the plaintiffs have accomplished is phenomenal.”

Sevier said he was proud that he had greatly narrowed the gap between him and Sharp in the Area 5 race.

“I’m disappointed, because I believe I have better experience, but I gave it my best effort,” Sevier said. “I feel very good about so many people, including a lot of first-time voters, coming out. I’m glad we got David on there.”

There were 1,620 registered ballots on Saturday, just under 1 percent of the EMC’s 174,000 members. Lawyer Michael King served as acting chair in place of lawyer Joe D. Whitley. Both are with the Greenberg Traurig firm in Atlanta.

The 2007 member lawsuit resulted in a complete turnover of the cooperative’s 10-member board of directors that began in November, when Ed Crowell, David Tennant, Cheryl Meadows and Malcolm Swanson were elected. All had been endorsed by the Owners Association.

Four more directors were elected March 31. They are Rudy Underwood, Kelly Bodner, Bryan Boyd and Eric Broadwell, and all but Broadwell were endorsed by the Owners Association. Those four, along with Sharp and McClellan, will attend their first board meeting on Tuesday.

Crowell, who was elected as chairman of the board in February, said this campaign had been “much too political.”

“But we have a pretty decent board. Part of my role now is to get everyone out of campaign mode and get serious about the business at hand,” Crowell said. The board will immediately get to work on determining the scope of a forensic audit, and then selecting a firm to do that work.

“We will spend whatever it takes to do it right and do it well,” Crowell said.

Chip Nelson, who was named last summer as chief executive of the utility, lauded the “solid” board that has been elected.

“There’s no reason this board can’t work well together,” Nelson said. “They all bring something positive to the table.”

When it was all over, Butch Thompson — who had made no secret of the fact that he did not believe Sharp, or any of the plaintiffs, should seek a seat on the board — said he is nevertheless excited for the EMC.

“Naturally we would have liked for our people to win, but the people have spoken,” he said. “In my opinion, this is the first time every board member has been elected by the membership, and that is historical. It is a great day.”

Don Bailey of Woodstock said he came out to vote yesterday to make certain that Hudson and Sharp were elected.

“They have good qualifications and good integrity, and we need people like that,” said Bailey, who has been an EMC member for about seven years.

Pam Strong, who lives in the Heritage Farms subdivision in northeast Cobb, said she came out to vote for McClellan and Sevier because she wanted to see change.

On Tuesday night, the EMC directors and company executives are planning to host the first town-hall meeting for members, from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. at EMC headquarters in Marietta. Seating is limited to 200 people on a first-come, first-served basis, though the room can accommodate up to about 350 people, company executives have said.

Attendees can register in advance by calling (678) 355-3102 or online at cobbemc.com/ townhall.

There will be a brief presentation at the town-hall meeting, after which directors and executives will take questions, chairman Crowell said.

Cobb EMC serves about 190,000 members in Cobb, Cherokee, Bartow, and Paulding counties in metro Atlanta, plus Randolph, Quitman, Calhoun and Clay counties in the south Georgia “Pataula” district.

The company’s fiscal year will end April 30, and its finance director has predicted a bottom line $4 million to $5 million less than the $22 million in net margins, or profit, recorded in fiscal 2011.
Comments
(27)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Campaigning..really?
|
April 24, 2012
People campaigned for this position and ran a dirty one? Really folks? Keep this in perspective. You are just an elected board who can be unelected. This isn't Washington, DC. Makes me wonder why people really wanted to run. The gross packages that the old board voted for themselves or to offer reform? We shall see
Going Forward
|
April 23, 2012
It's time to get to work.

The election is over, and we are blessed with a bunch of really well qualified Directors.

It's time to stop targeting one or another EMC employee. Let the audit do its job, and the pieces fall where they may.

Recriminations are not facts, and we don't need any more personal vendettas.

In the meantime let's cut these employees some slack.... and that includes the management.

Go Directors. Work as a team. We have your back.
Watcher of you
|
April 23, 2012
I'm back,the new board is elected it's about a even swap.it will be interesting to see how the votes go with the board we shall see who's for cobb emc or who's out for old # one.we will be watching!!!.
Bob Bummer
|
April 23, 2012
Now it is time to allow mail in voting on board members and to set term limits.
EMC VOTER
|
April 22, 2012
Thank goodness the EMC runoff election is over! It was bitter sweet however. Tripper Sharp won but that fine intelligent gentleman, Jim Hudson did not. And to think he was defeated by a man who ran such a dirty untruthful campaign. You can be sure that McClennen's win produced a sign of relief from the EMC management. But Jim Hudson not being on the board is such a loss to the membership.

For the most part, we have a good board. There are only a couple owned by the EMC management.

With Tripper and a few others at the helm, we should eventually be able to overcome the huge financial loses to our EMC.

clmiron
|
April 22, 2012
I would really like the MDJ to investigate who funded the postcards on behalf of McClellan and Sevier. Based on the way my postcard was addressed it was hard to determine if the CEOA was behind the mailings using the member mailing list provided to them by Cobb EMC, or if Cobb EMC in fact paid for them (the ones which claimed Sharp and Hudson would continue corruption and result in higher rates).

Frankly, I think the CEOA overstepped their supposed "mission". One has to wonder what they would have to gain by influencing the board election. Is Whelden and company just looking for a feather in their cap and bragging rights? Or is there some other potential conflict of interest at work here? It seems completely irrational for them to have taken such a negative tone against two perfectly fine candidates and spent money on the effort unless there was something to be gained down the road from it personally.

Cobb EMC Member
|
April 23, 2012
All of the Board Election campaign funding should be disclosed and/or investigaged ! The MDJ already knows who paid for the ads and stickers !

Little more would require them to do some journalistic professional work ? Is the MDJ capable and willing - Judge Schuster should be asking the questions - he set the table for the election corruption.
Wouln'tWant2BU..
|
April 22, 2012
McClellan!!! Running a trash campaign against the long known and well liked Hudson just so you can get on the board and continue the dirty work for Nelson, Brown, Kelly and their ilk? How can you sleep at night??? Just proves that you can fool some of the people some of the time - like the folks that you bussed in. But you won't be able to fool all of us. We'll all be watching you!!!
LidoShuffle
|
April 22, 2012
How ironic that one of the things Sharpe and all of the other plaintiffs complained about from the beginning was that they wanted greater participation of members in the process (and then argued bitterly against mail in ballots)... the result: less than one-percent voted yesterday. Ironic I'd say. I'd also say it shows that members don't give a hoot.
EMC Member
|
April 23, 2012
While turnout was low with jsut 1600 voters participating. Turnout was still so much higher than any annual meeting prior. Before the lawsuit only about 300 members participated in the elections. At least it's progress.
Harry A.
|
April 23, 2012
You obviously haven't bothered to read the existing By-Laws which is too bad. The co-op as previously constituted could have totally loaded the voting for the former Directors. Proxy voting can now be instituted by mail along new guidelines that prevent any favoring of existing Director's positions to the detriment of potential candidates. That's what it's all about isn't it, free and honest elections?
anonymous
|
April 22, 2012
The new EMC Board has much to prove.

The new Cobb EMC Board of Directors has a significant job ahead of them. When Butch Thompson says it is the “first time that the member owners have elected every Director on the EMC Board”, he is referring to the traditional game played by EMC management, where very few customers ever attended the annual meetings. Management coerced block voting by EMC employees assured that management’s candidates won those elections.

Unfortunately, what we have just witnessed is a similar game conducted with a slightly different approach. True to form, very few customer owners chose to vote (1% or less), which made the election much easier to manipulate. With the support and funding from leaders of the CEOA and coercion of EMC employees, management’s candidates were endorsed. When the CEOA endorsement magic failed on March 31st, a political smear campaign for their two remaining candidates was undertaken using negative attacks and outright lies against their opponents. Some of their actions may have exceeded the bounds of libel and mail fraud.

Since management, CEOA leaders, and the candidates were so driven to win and obviously comfortable using these tactics, they had one candidate to prevail in the runoff election by a margin of 50 votes. What kind of man is this, and how well will he work for the customer owners (who he theoretically represents), when the appearance is that he owes his position to insiders. This is hardly a mandate from the owners.

The new Board of Directors has much to prove. However, they don’t even know what the financial condition of Cobb EMC truly is, or what unfunded obligations may be hidden in the past actions of the management, or are yet to be determined by the courts. The Board will need the active oversight of the owners, and can only achieve this through a stronger relationship with them.

Surgeon2
|
April 22, 2012
Now let’s get rid of the remaining WARTS at Cobb EMC!

W = Washington; gone!

A = Alford, Dean; still hangin around

R = Rayder, J.W.; $40 K/ month consultant and $30K/month committee chairman

T = The Lawyers that are representing Brownie

S = Sherali, Anis; No bid manager of Brownies no bid power supply deal with his buddy Cliff Hare

EMC member
|
April 22, 2012
Many thanks to Kim Isaza and the Marietta Daily Journal for the excellent articles during the past years. Don't believe the results would ever have been the same without the flood lights having been turned on by the MDJ.

After receiving the uggly postcards in my mailbox late yesterday afternoon, and the incredible bad emails the days before, I realized what we had been missing. Does not reflect well on the CEOA.

It is fantastic that the revolution to replace the old Cobb EMC has taken place. Now, let's not get into the dirty hole which was there before. It's time work together without calling each other names. Let the "others" do that.
PMT
|
April 22, 2012
Being a plaintiff in litigation against Cobb EMC was hardly a qualifying event. I would argue it was more of a disqualifying event. You were quick to point out the old waste and abuse but forgot to mention your immediate waste of members monies to hold the special election. Wouldn't it have been more prudent to simply withdraw, wish your opponent well and then wait until the next election cycle? By the way, your election mailings didn't arrive via the USPS until the evening of the election after the polls had closed. What a waste of money!
EMC Member
|
April 22, 2012
@PMT: Not sure who you were criticizing in your missive. Tripper Sharp was the only plaintiff in the case that ran for the Board of Directors.

I am not sure why either Tripper or Jim Hudson would have withdrawn after coming in first place in the March 31st election. So I would think it would be a stretch to criticize them for the costs of the runoff election. That criticsm falls directly on McClellan and Sevier's shoulders, who both finished in second place in the March 31st election. Ultimately we had a runoff only for the personal benefit of David McClellan. It is clear that he cares less about the members. Only himself.

Neither Jim Hudson nor Tripper Sharp did any mail-outs for the runoff election. Only Charles Sevier and David McClellan did mail outs (tasteless I might add) and they arrived Saturday afternoon.

itstime
|
April 22, 2012
Sharp looks like Rep. Gerald Nadler from New York. Now that he is on the board of Cobb EMC, let's hope he doesn't act like Nadler. He should not have run and now that he has been elected I hope he doesn't act like Brown.
anonymous
|
April 22, 2012
What?????????????????????????
Iknowyou..
|
April 23, 2012
Who are you to compare anyone. Have you looked in the mirror recently? Tasteless, it is, you are!

Oh, you are also clueless but that too is your history. However, you might have a point about

who should run and who shouldn't. Wish you had and what a loss it would have been...might have taught you a lesson on manners.
KSUsed
|
April 22, 2012
Now let's go after the school board....
Dumbfounded2
|
April 22, 2012
Hudson is correct. McClellan ran a trash campaign. Well one Cobb EMC management cronie on the board is better than all of the board being Brownie plants. Maybe Sharp can keep McClellan in line.

Bring on the Audit!!!!
J Balfour
|
April 22, 2012
Now if we could just do that in Congress and in the state legislature. Too many in for way too long. Even if over 70% of the population wants something, they vote against it because their lobbyists tell them to.
anonymous
|
April 22, 2012
We can. And we must.
anonymous
|
April 22, 2012
Yeah, like McClellan.
Happy Camper
|
April 22, 2012
I guess it goes to show who has the integrity. Shame on you Jim Hudson! And hopeful they can keep Tripper under control.
anonymous
|
April 22, 2012
Happy Camper, you sound bitter. Are you one of the EMC crony thugs now afraid that your cushy gig is about to be uncovered/ended? Is that you Sam Kelly?

anonymous
|
April 22, 2012
Mr. Kelly, glad your happy..... for now.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, and spam will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides