The Raptor is, quite simply, the most capable, most advanced and most deadly fighter jet ever built. It commands the skies and has the ability to knock other fighters out of the sky before they have even crossed the horizon, i.e., before they even realize the Raptors are there. It is a plane designed to sweep the skies of enemy aircraft and thereby make the battlefield a safer place for the infantry far below.
Unfortunately, the Raptor’s high cost made it a fat target for the Obama administration and many in Congress. And they have pulled the plug on the program after only 195 of the initially expected 1,300 copies were manufactured. The end of the Cold War meant, for many in Washington, that there was no need for such a plane, so they steadily began whittling away at the program year after year. And because so much of the plane’s built-in cost was accrued on the front end during the R&D phase, that meant that the average cost of each plane rose each time the overall number to be purchased was cut.
The final F-22 rolled out of the plant last December, and will be “delivered” to the Air Force in a ceremony at the plant on Tuesday. It then will be deployed to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson near Anchorage, Alaska, joining an F-22 squadron.
The F-22 program created thousands of well-paying jobs and put food on plenty of local tables for two decades. It also drew to Marietta hundreds of highly educated and superbly skilled engineers and technicians, and gave Lockheed an impetus to spend millions of dollars upgrading the vintage-World War II plant. Those upgrades, and the sterling performance by all involved in the F-22, were a big reason that Lockheed chose the plant to help build portions of its newest fighter, the F-35 Lightning II.
Raptors will still be seen overhead occasionally as they are returned to the plant for upgrades and repairs. But the F-22 line has been shut down and packed away.
Will we ever learn from our mistakes?











Follow us on Twitter!
A drone can out-perfom a manned aircraft.
The F-22 is the most capable, most advanced, most deadly MANNED fighter jet ever produced.
Indeed it is designed to clear the skies of enemy aircraft, but unmanned machines can do that also. Cheaper, better.
That's because there are NONE! And THAT's because there's a HUGE difference between 1) sending our 200mph prop-drones with their cameras to fire a missile at a couple of terrorists in a cafe with no air force at all and 2) finding, identifying, and successfully engaging a SAM site with a 4000 mph SAM that can engage from 100 miles, or a maneuvering fighter which can actually fire back!
People think our drones have disproven the value of a man in the cockpit - all they've proven so far is that undefended, immobile targets with no defense can be killed by an unmanned drone which, by the way, are also expensive to maintain and, as we've seen in Iraq, Afghan, and Iran, are as good as meat when they experience a "lost signal", jamming, hacking, slight battle damage, etc.
The world's preeminent body on peace and all things good for humanity, a.k.a the United Nations, certainly has done a great job of peace management, eh?
Look. You can scream for peace all you want, but there will always be a certain number of malcontents who want power at all cost, not to mention all of "your stuff". Although the concept may be foreign to you, these people have absolutely no interest in peace...and you cannot convince them peace is the right thing. The UN has tried for over 60 years, and there are way more wars going on around the world now than there were when they got started. Then there was Wilson's League of Nations. Yeah, that worked too.
Please let me remind this (chronically biased) editorial board that the seeds of this were sewn in 2008 (the Bush administration)...and I quote from GW Bush's own Secretary of Defense Robert Gates...."The reality is we are fighting two wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the F-22 has not performed a single mission in either theater. So it is principally for use against a near peer in a conflict, and I think we all know who that is," Gates said. "And looking at what I regard as the level of risk of conflict with one of those near peers over the next four or five years until the Joint Strike Fighter comes along, I think that something along the lines of 183 is a reasonable buy."
NOT. ONE.
Quote above from "wait a second" was from Secretary of Defense Robert Gates during February 2008 (which was during the Bush administration).
I guess this is a bit difficult to swallow since it seems the right wing in this country have been quite busy re-writing 2008's history and tended to ascribe all sorts of stuff that went on during the final year of the Bush administration to Obama -- steep job losses driving unemployment from 5% to 8.9%, bailing out AIG, bailing out GM, stuffing money down the major banks' throats whether they thought they needed it or no, etc, etc, etc.